We eat food in vegetarian and non vegetarian. Both have varieties of very good tastes & mouth watering preparations. Only difference in these two is one has got minimal hurting / killing of the beings without our concious feeling , and other has max. hurting and only killing, encountering heavy fight for survival of the beings handled. Every human wants to live happily with delicious food and other comforts. Deliciousness being available in both catagories, is it necessary to pose max. hurting and inevitable killing following the other route ?



We want to live and avoid death. We don't allow others to live and make them die while choosing the non vegetarian route and not sticking to the other route involving minimal hurting /killing without much fuss . How much we are justified ?



If it is deemed that non veg. route puts a check on the population growth - menace of the beings , can it not be dealt suitably at that point of the ripened situation ?



Is it that difficult to avoid cruel killing for our continued entertainement of delicious food ?